Category: essay Page 2 of 3

INTERPLAY BETWEEN PROGRESS AND TRADITION IN SOCIETY

On February 6, 2025

In the evolution of societies, the interplay between progress and tradition is a recurring theme. Choices between innovation and cultural preservation mire communities and are often in conflict with shifting identities, values, and aspirations. This tension not only influences policy-making and economic growth but also deeply affects the lives of individuals and the cohesion of communities.

Progress represents the desire for a better future. It is alluring in the sense that it promises to end traditional fears of poverty and economic stagnation. It also promotes innovation, bringing shifts from traditional practices to newer ones. Progressive ideas move societies to a newer path than tradition can offer.

Tradition, however, is a representation of old values and customs transferred from one generation to another. It is the collection of morals, ethics, and lifestyles that have continued for thousands of years. Tradition is the mirror through which culture can be viewed. When there is something new going on but there is also a desire to keep sticking to old traditions, there arises conflict. Such a conflict may arise at an individual level, for instance, trying to move from one technology to the next; in families, for example, trying to shift from traditional joint to nuclear; and also in societies, striving to adopt new philosophies that challenge the old established themes.

In Nepal, for instance, there have been conflicts in preserving tradition while also moving forward using technology. Urbanisation has brought tensions among the people as they want services they get in cities, but they also carry the nostalgia of village lives. Rapid technological change has benefitted the rich and the powerful, creating gaps between them and the marginalised communities. Where traditional thoughts have benefitted the elites, they have chosen to stagnate society and refuse technological advancements. The desire for the new generation to adopt new technology but the older generations’ refusal to do so is one of the causes of conflict.

Maintaining a balance between tradition and progress, thus, is an enormous challenge to policymakers. They have to keep traditionalists happy while also moving forward to better policies and innovations. Since societies deeply rooted in traditions are often stagnant, it is necessary to identify the major drives to carry them forward. For instance, the preservation of cultures of Newa tradition through the use of technology such as photos, videos, and digitalisation has not only supported tradition but also adopted technological progress. Therefore, policymakers should be able to identify the unique desires of the people following the traditions while supporting innovation.

Societies have incorporated both tradition and progress since they both represent our willingness to preserve ancient teachings, philosophies, and cultures while shaping the path for future generations. Although it could be difficult to strike a perfect balance between tradition and progress, bringing them together through dialogues, innovative policies, and practices yields a better society.

Dead Poets Society was Disappointing

By Sandeept

On June 5, 2023

In Movies, Blogging, essay, Review

Quotes of the movie Dead Poets Society keep popping up on my Facebook and Twitter feeds. Recently, I came across a few tweets celebrating its 34^th anniversary. I had never watched the movie and didn’t even know its plot, so I decided to watch it. However, it did not meet my expectations. The premise of testosterone-filled boys within a strict school system had to be impactful and somewhat relatable, but the initial promise faltered towards the end.

The film begins with the boys of Welton Academy carrying the banners, labeled, “Tradition,” “Honor,” “Discipline,” and “Excellence.” It reminded me of Amitabh Bachhan’s “Parampara, Prathistha, Anushasan (Tradition, Prestige, Discipline) speech from Mohabbatein (2000). Both the movies are set in a tradition-loving boys’ school, and in both, a teacher disrupts the status quo. The differences are numerous. However, a major difference is that the Bollywood movie ends with a light note, whereas the Hollywood flick has a tragic ending, which I think, was too contrived.

Dead Poets Society has problems from the beginning. The first scene I noticed is the one where the boys are smoking in Neil and Todd’s room. How they are not caught and punished for smoking in the school premises is beyond my comprehension. Also, Neil’s father does not scold his son for smoking. I don’t know if smoking in school was normal in the US in 1950s since they show the Principal and parents doing so when Todd comes to sign the confession letter, but it absolutely bothered me.

The students also get assignments (which is normal for all schools), but they are never shown to get punished for failing to submit them in time in never shown. Moreover, the other teachers seem to notice the members of Dead Poets Society leave the school at night, but they don’t act on it. Because the first act never shows any consequences for the actions of students, I was not convinced that the school was strict. So, when Charlie aka Nuwanda gets punished later, it does not have an impact.

The book ripping scene is also overdramatic and has a dangerous message. It’s one thing to dislike someone’s views or not conform to unnecessary technicalities, but tearing pages from a book is a different matter. John Keating tells early on that he won’t tolerate anything that is against what he believes. He encourages his students remove the entire preface based on one paragraph and his students follow his instruction without even bothering to see if there are better insights into poetry. He wants his students to be anti-conformists, but makes them conform to his ridiculous ideas. He talks about them finding their own voice, but does not even ask for their opinion on the matter. What hypocrisy!

Keating has great lines like:

We don’t read and write poetry because it’s cute. We read and write poetry because we are members of the human race. And the human race is filled with passion.

No matter what anybody tells you, words and ideas can change the world.

“Boys, you must strive to find your own voice. Because the longer you wait to begin, the less likely you are to find it at all. Thoreau said, “Most men lead lives of quiet desperation.” Don’t be resigned to that. Break out!”

“There’s a time for daring and there’s a time for caution, and a wise man understands which is called for.”

“Now we all have a great need for acceptance, but you must trust that your beliefs are unique, your own, even though others may think them odd or unpopular.”

These lines in the movie, however, are just those—lines! Keating’s students don’t use words and ideas to change the world. They are attracted to poetry because they want to flirt with girls. Also, they could have changed so many things, but they just want is for the school to become co-educational. Neil does not try using words to change his father’s thoughts, cannot fight for his passion, and commits suicide when he could have either rebelled or escaped his father in a few months.

The other boys, too, can’t follow their teacher. They don’t speak in favor of the teacher they are so keen to follow. They can’t tell why or how Neil was unhappy and that the pressure put upon them is sucking the lives out of them. Except Charlie, everyone signs the confession which expels Keating. As a result, the last “O, Captain, My Captain” scene looked artificial to me. (Keating shouldn’t even have been allowed to get in the class or see the students after what he has been blamed for!) They might have been able to overcome their fear, but it does it help Keating? Can they overcome their guilt? What will the Principal and the school administration do to them? Will they be expelled or silenced?

Some other questions trouble me. Is it wrong to honor tradition? Is it bad to become disciplined and pursue excellence? While I believe that sticking to tradition can make us rigid towards change and less rebellious, I don’t think it is bad to work towards a goal with discipline.

Overall, despite wonderful quotes, Dead Poets Society did not work for me. It skips realism (just as Keating does in his poetry class), does not embrace rebellion, and forgets what it preaches.

इन्टु मिन्टु लण्डनमा

By Sandeept

On May 4, 2023

In Blogging, essay, Nepal, Nepali, नेपाली

लोक सेवाको परीक्षा केन्द्र राखिएको एउटा स्कूल । अलि छिटै पुगेकाले यताउता गरिरहेको थिएँ । आँप(?) को रूखमुनि उभिएर अगाडिको ब्लकतिर हेरिरहेको थिएँ । एउटी सानी (सायद कक्षा एक या दुईमा पढ्ने) केटी झ्यालमा आइन् । उनी सँगै आए तीनचार जना अरु केटीहरू । “ओहो ! आज कति धेरै कति धेरै नौला मान्छेहरू !” उनीहरू भनिरहेका थिए । जिज्ञासा पनि थियो आफूआफू बीचमा, “आज के हो ? किन आएका यी मानिसहरू?”

हामी पनि त स्कूलमा नयाँ मानिस आउँदा यस्तै कुराकानी गर्थ्यौं नि ! “को आए ? किन आए ?” जस्ता प्रश्नले मन उथलपुथल हुन्थ्यो । जवाफ नपाउन्जेल आँखा कक्षा बाहिर डुल्थे । तर बाहिर हेर्ने अनुमति कहाँ हुन्थ्यो र ? गुरु, गुरुआमाहरूले थाहा पाउनुभयो भने त सजाय पनि हुन्थ्यो । कक्षामा पढाइ नभएका बेला (लिजर)मा मात्रै बाहिर हेर्न पाइन्थ्यो । त्यो पनि डराइ डराइ !

यी साना नानीहरूको पनि लिजर पो थियो कि ? नभए त शिक्षकले बाहिर हेर्न पक्कै दिँदैनथे । उनीहरूको क्रियाकलापले भने मलाई तोत्तोचानको याद दिलायो । “सन् १९३० तिरकी जापानी तोत्तो-चानको सन् २०२० को दशकका नेपाली नानीहरूसँग के सम्बन्ध ?” एक मनले जवाफ माग्यो । अर्को मनले भन्यो, “बालसुलभ चञ्चलता त जहाँ र जहिले पनि उस्तै हुन्छ, हैन ?” मनको वादविवाद चलिरहेकै बेला परीक्षार्थी मध्येकी एक महिलाले ती बालिकाहरूतिर हेरेर हात हल्लाइन् । जवाफमा सुरुमा झ्यालबाहिर हेर्ने अग्ली केटीले हात हल्लाई । म अनायास मुस्कुराएँ । उनीहरूले भने मलाई याद गरेनन् । केही बेर पछि तिनै साना नानीहरू म उभिएको ठाउँमा हेर्न थाले । मैले हात हल्लाएँ । उनीहरू लजाए । अघि एक अपरिचित महिलालाई सजिलै हात हल्लाएका नानीहरू अहिले एक अपरिचित पुरुषसँग भने लजाए । त्यसमा सायद डर पनि मिसिएको थियो कि ?

***

इन्टु मिन्टु लण्डनमा

हाम्रो बाबा पल्टनमा

स्कुलको पाले दाइ

पहिलो घण्टी बजाइदेऊ

टिनिनिनिनी… झ्याप्प

एकछिनपछि बच्चाहरूले गीत गाउँदै खेलेको सुनियो । नोस्टाल्जिक भइयो । यो गीतिखेल कति पुरानो हो थाहा छैन तर सानामा खेलेको याद अझै ताजा छ । सुगम पोखरेलको एउटा गीतमा पनि यो अट्यो । धेरै अघि नै बालबोलीमा बसिसकेको यो गीत अहिलेका केटाकेटी पनि यही गीत गाइरहेका छन् । केही वर्षपछि सायद मेरी छोरी पनि यो खेलमा सहभागी हुनेछिन् र सायद उनीपछिको पुस्ता पनि।

यति शक्तिशाली यो गीतिखेल कसले सुरु गर्यो होला ? कसरी फैलियो होला ? मन कल्पिन थाल्यो । कतिपय कुराहरु जीवनमा यसरी धुलिएका हुन्छन् कि तिनको सुरुवात कसरी भयो भन्ने कुरा कल्पना समेत गरिँदो रहेनछ । तर अब भने यो बालखेलको रचयिताबारे जान्न मन भयो । जान्न मन भयो इन्दु र मिन्टु को थिए ? कसरी लण्डन पुगे ? गीत गाउने बच्चाका बाबु पल्टनमा कसरी पुगे ? कुन पल्टनमा छन् अनि कहाँ लडाई गर्दैछन ? फर्किएर आउलान् कि नाउलान् ? जिउँदै आउलान् कि बाकसमा ?

मनमा आएका यी प्रश्नहरूको उत्तर भेटिएन । तर जवाफको अभावमा मन कहाँ शान्त भयो र ? यो त झनै छट्पटियो । अरू प्रश्नलाई थाती राखेर इन्दु र मिन्टु कस्ता थिए होलान् र कसरी लण्डन पुगे होलान् भनी कल्पिन थाल्यो । इन्टु मिन्टु सम्भ्रान्त वा लाहुरे परिवारमा जन्मिएका थिए कि ? कम्तीमा ४० वर्ष अघि गीत रचिएको थियो भने त्यो कालखण्डमा लण्डन जाने ल्याकत धनीमनी र बेलायती गोर्खा रेजिमेन्टमा सैनिक सेवामा भर्ती हुनेसँग मात्रै थियो । धेरै सम्पत्ति भएका तर ठूला व्यापार नभएका धेरै नेपाली परिवार बेलयात मात्रै होइन, अमेरिका, अस्ट्रेलिया र युरोपेली देशहरूप्रति आकर्षित हुने गरेको धेरै समय भइसकेको छ । उनीहरू यहाँ अवसर देख्दैनन् । अवसर भए पनि विदेशी मुद्रा साटेर आउने रकम र उताको जीवनशैलीको लालसाले गर्दा नेपालमा अडिन सक्दैनन् । पछि केही मध्यम वर्गीय परिवारका सदस्यहरू पनि यही सिको गर्दै उता पुगे । अहिले रहरले देश बस्नेको सङ्ख्या नगण्य छ ।

गीतिखेलका पात्रहरूका बाबाहरू पल्टनमा छन् । कुन पल्टनमा होलान् बाबा ? बेलायती गोर्खा पल्टनमा कि भारतको गोर्खा पल्टनमा ? सिंगापुरमा कि हङकङमा ? खाडीमा पसिना चुहाउँदै छन् कि ? कतै कुल्ली र दरबानको काम गर्दै मुस्किलले कमाइरहेका छन् कि ? गाउँघरमा पल्टने हुँ भन्दा मान बढ्ने भएकाले पल्टनमा छु भनेर ढाँटेका पो हुन् कि ? इन्टु मिन्टु जति सुरक्षित र सम्पन्न छैनन् कि ? सम्पन्न हुन पनि सक्छन् तर यी बाबाहरू सुन्दर भविष्य लागि ज्यान हत्केलामा राखेर श्रम बेच्न पुगेका पक्कै हुन् ।

हाम्रो पुस्ता केही हदसम्म “पल्टने” बाबाहरूले पालेका हुन् । तिनका छोराछोरीले पनि त्यही बाटो अँगालेका छन्। जुन सङ्ख्यामा देश छोड्नेको लर्को छ, त्यसले हामीलाई सङ्कटमा लाने निश्चित छ । तर पनि राज्य गम्भीर बनेको छैन। हुन त उसले जनतालाई विदेशमा बेच्ने नीति लिएको छ । उसका कान बन्द छन् । सुन्न तयार छैन युवा पुस्ताको क्रन्दन । युवा पुस्ता सरकारी सेवा प्रति पनि आक्रोशित छन् अनि निजी संस्थामा हुने श्रम शोषणले गलेका छन् । केही युवाहरू सरकारी जागिरको चौतारीमा आराम खोजिरहेका छन् । म आफैँ पनि त्यस्तो चौतारी खोज्दैछु । खोज सफल हुन्छ हुँदैन थाहा छैन तर यसले पनि सन्तुष्ट बनाउला जस्तो लाग्दैन । राजनीति र प्रशासनमा युवाहरूको दह्रो हस्तक्षेप नभई अहिलेको अवस्था परिवर्तन हुन सक्दैन । यद्यपि, नवपुस्तामा भरिएको निराशा समाधान नहुने हो कि भन्ने डर छ । यो अन्तत: देशका लागि नै घातक हुन सक्छ । यो अन्धकारको अवस्थाबाट उज्यालोतर्फ लाने शक्ति युवाहरूमै छ । हामीहरू संयमित, इमान्दार र लगनशील हुन चाहिँ आवश्यक छ ।

२०८०/०१/२५

Good Bye, Dear 70s!

By Sandeept

On April 14, 2023

In Blogging, essay, Musings, Nepal

Nepal was in turmoil when the 70s began. The first constituent assembly (CA) had died at the hands of our “visionary leaders” and the chances of getting a constitution that would “transform everything” were bleak. The election for the second CA took place on Mangsir 4, 2070, but it could not deliver on its promise.

The work on constitution only took place after the Gorkha earthquake of Baishakh 12, 2072. The 7.8 moment magnitude disaster killed 8,964 and injured 21,952 people. Thousands of people were displaced from their homes. The government had to take help from the international community to look for the lost, rehabilitate the homeless, and reconstruct the damaged structures. The need for financial aid was probably one of the factors that made our leaders work quicker on the constitution.

We finally got our seventh constitution on Ashoj 3, 2072. Although it wasn’t accepted in all the parts of the country, it gave hopes that it would change lives. It positively changed the lives of some marginalized people. But it did not bring the transformations the leaders said it would bring. Except on their lives, of course!

Federalism became a way to manage leaders, and it has failed to ignite any hope on youths. Decades of political instability has killed our hopes of economic change and political revolution, and more youths are fleeing the country. Despite having a large number of youth, we are turning into a country of the elderly. This issue will be even more serious in the 80s.

The 80s is arriving at a time of economic regression. The revenues have decreased, and we are spending more that we can earn. The NRB is seeking investment on bonds, economic activities are dying, and the government has decided to cut off social security. However, the government, economists and mainstream media are lying on our faces. Although we are losing trust on our institutions, we neither have courage not interest in fighting them. We are running from our problems, instead.

I think the 80s will be the last decade to “make or break” for Nepal. It’s high time we address the real issues and start solving them instead of denying or turning away.

लोकतन्त्र : केही आशा, धेरै आशंका

By Sandeept

On January 18, 2023

In Blogging, essay, Humanity, Humans and Humanity, Nepal, Nepali, Politics

बिहानीले दिनको संकेत गर्छ भन्छन् । मङ्सिर ४ को चुनावमा तेस्रो भएको पार्टीका नेता जुन राजनीतिक दाउपेचको आडमा प्रधानमन्त्री बने अनि त्यसको रमिते मतदाता हुनुपर्यो, यो राम्रो बिहानीको संकेत हुँदै हैन । नेपाली कांग्रेसले ८९ सिट जितेको थियो । उसले प्रत्यक्ष तर्फ सदर मतको २५.७१% र समानुपातिकमा २३.१९% मत पाएको छ । जम्मा ७८ सिट जितेको नेकपा (एमाले) प्रत्यक्ष र समानुपातिकमा क्रमशः २६.९५% र ३०.८३% मत पाएको छ । तर सरकारको नेतृत्व गरेको छ प्रत्यक्षमा ११.१३% र समानुपातिकमा ९.३७% मत ल्याएको नेकपा माओवादी केन्द्रले !

दुई वर्षअघि एमाले र माके एक थिए र नेकपा कहलाइन्थे । त्यो बेला आलोपालो प्रधानमन्त्री हुनुपर्छ भन्न थालेपछि एमालेका नेताले पार्टी फुटाइदिएका थिए । माकेका नेताले एक्लै नजित्ने संकेत पाएपछि चुनावमा कांग्रेसलाई बुई बोक्न लगाए । जब गन्तब्य आइपुग्यो, बुई बोक्नेलाई लात्ती हान्दै फेरि एमालेका नेतासँग मिल्न गए । एकले अर्कोलाई सत्तो सराप गर्ने तिनीहरू अहिले फेरि ‘लङ्गौटिया यार’ बनेका छन् । लात्ती खाने दलका नेताले पनि आफ्नो स्वार्थका लागि लात्ती हान्नेकै पाउ मोल्न गए, विश्वासको मत दिंदै ।

सत्तामा पुग्नको लागि जे पनि गर्ने यिनीहरूको नक्कचरो पाराले आजित भएका नेपालीहरू विकल्पहरू खोजिरहेका थिए / छन् । केही पार्टीहरू चुनावमा उदाए पनि । तर अरूभन्दा फरक हुन्छौं भन्ने उनीहरू सत्ताको तर मार्न व्यस्त छन् । २० सिट जितेको रास्वपाका सभापति गृहमन्त्री बने । नागरिकताको विषयमा अन्तिम निर्णय दिने गृहमन्त्रीको नै नागरिकता विवादमा छ र अदालतले मुद्दा हेरिरहेको छ । “अदालतमा मुद्दा चलिरहेकाले नबोलेका” पार्टीका नेताहरूमा पनि सत्ता र शक्तिकै आसक्ति देखिरहेको छु । यद्यपि मौका पाएको बेला केही सुधार गर्छन् कि भन्ने झिनो आशा छ ।

अहिलेको मन्त्रिपरिषद् यस्तो खिचडी बनेको छ कि के भन्ने ? गणतन्त्रवादीदेखि राजावादीसम्म अनि संघीयताका पृष्ठपोषकदेखि विरोधीसम्म सबैले मौका पाएका छन् । सायद समावेशीकरण भनेको यही होला । जे होस्, राज्य समावेशी बनाउनुपर्छ भनेर वकालत गर्ने पार्टीले नेतृत्व लिएको सरकार समाबेशी देखिएको छैन । गरीब, दलित र सीमान्तकृतलाई जति नै उत्थान गर्नुपर्छ भने पनि यो प्रणाली उनीहरूको पहुँचमा छैन ।

उसो त राजनीति सीमित व्यक्ति र पार्टीहरूकै नियन्त्रणमा छ । उनीहरू हामीलाई भोट हाल्न लगाउँछन् मीठा सपना देखाउँदै । अनि हामी मत हालिदिन्छौं । हुन त हामीसँग उपाय पनि छैन । न हामी कसैलाई भोट नहाल्ने भनेर मतपत्रमै छाप हान्न पाउछौं न त छानिएका प्रतिनिधिको काम चित्त नबुझ्दा तिनलाई फिर्ता बोलाउनै सक्छौँ । नेताहरू मैमत्त साँढेजस्ता बन्छन् अनि हामी चैं बाली खाएको देख्दादेख्दै पनि धपाउन नसकेर आफूले आफैंलाई सराप्छौँ । यति नै त होला नि हामीले पाउने लोकतन्त्र !

Save Tri-Chandra

By Sandeept

On July 9, 2022

In Blogging, essay, History, Humanity, Humans and Humanity, Nepal, Nepali, Personal, Politics, Public Interest

Chandra Shamsher Jung Bahadur Rana inaugurated the Tribhuvan-Chandra (now called Tri-Chandra) College in 1918. After the inauguration, he supposedly said, “I dug a grave for the Ranas with my own hands.” What caused the downfall of the Ranas–the college or his division of Ranas into three classes–might have been debated by historians. What this statement shows, however, is the attitude of the rulers towards this educational institute.

Tri-Chandra has been ill for a long time. When I had written a poem, titled Shatabdi (Century), the condition of the original building (Ghantaghar) was already bad. The walls were rotting, peepal had sprouted in the cracks, and roofs were leaking. I used to call it a Ghost House. After the earthquake of April 2015, the laboratories of the Department of Geology had been shut down. Since then, the practicals have never been regular. The southern section of the building closer to the Jame Masjid collapsed last year. Ironically, the building which produces geologists who study earthquake and earthquake resistance technology has suffered such a fate!

Tri-Chandra College has always been a torch-bearer in Nepalese politics. The vicinity of Narayanhiti Palace and Singha Durbar as well as other centers of power may be one of the reasons. However, the impact of this college on politics was predicted by Chandra Shamsher himself. Tri-Chandra’s students have been part of movements that toppled the Ranas, the Panchayat, and the Shah dynasty. From talents and visionaries like Mahakavi Laxmi Prasad Devkota, Bal Krishna Sam, Dayananda Bajracharya, and so on to the present PM Sher Bahadur Deuba and popular leader Gagan Thapa (who are not doing that great, by the way), Tri-Chandra College has produced many personalities in the past.

The curse that has dragged Tri-Chandra College into this abyss is perhaps politics itself. The ones who used Tri-Chandra as ladders to gain power, probably don’t want the youth to come up. Perhaps, they see the rise of college as a grave to their political careers. If not so, why haven’t they done anything since the earthquake?

Some students somehow got united and conducted a march demanding to save Tri-Chandra. It touched me. How could I forget about the institute where I studied for four years? Why did I stop writing blogs about the state of the college? Why didn’t I join #SaveTriChandra campaign earlier?

I don’t know who is responsible for improving the condition of the college. I don’t know if the college, university, or the government should work towards saving the college. What I do know is that the current students and the alumni all can help the college. A lot of us can provide financial and technical support. If not, we can at least raise our voices. Let’s do something, please! Let’s save Tri-Chandra!

***You can read the Nepali version here.***

के नेपालीको दलीय सोच तोडिएला ?

By Sandeept

On June 8, 2022

In Blogging, essay, Musings, Nepal, Nepali, Politics, Public Interest, नेपाली

वैशाख ३० गते स्थानीय तहको निर्वाचन आउन दुई दिन बाँकी थियो । घरमा कसलाई भोट हाल्ने भन्ने विषयमा छलफल हुँदै थियो । “भोट किन हाल्ने ?” मैले सोधेँ । “वडा समितिका अध्यक्ष र सदस्य बन्न कै लागि ठूला (भ्रष्ट) नेताको अघिपछि लाग्ने अनि आम नागरिकका टोलमा पनि नआउने उम्मेदवारलाई किन जिताउने ?”

बाबाले सम्झाउन खोज्नुभयो । “एकदुई जनाले भोट नहालेर के हुन्छ ? एकजनाले बढी भोट हाल्यो भने पनि कुनै एउटाले जितिहाल्छ । यति पर्सेन्ट ल्याउनैपर्ने भन्ने बाध्यता पनि छैन ।”

“त्यसो भए खराबमध्येबाट मात्रै छान्नुपर्ने हो त ? राम्रा उम्मेदवार दिन सक्दैनन् दलहरूले ?”

“दिँदैनन् ।”

“अनि किन भोट हाल्ने त ?” मलाई चित्त बुझ्दै बुझेन । “अनि चुनावअघि त यस्तो घमण्ड गर्छन् । चुनाव जितेको भोलिपल्ट देखि के होला ?”

प्रमुख पदका एक उम्मेदवारको रवैया मन परिरहेको थिएन । प्रष्ट विरोध गरेँ । “बालेन शाहले राम्रा र गर्न सकिने योजनाहरू ल्याएका छन् । इन्जिनियर हुन् । प्राविधिक ज्ञान पनि छ । एकचोटि मौका दिऊँ न ।”

तर पार्टीमा सक्रिय रहनु भएका मेरा परिवारका सदस्यहरूले आफ्नो दलबाट आएका उम्मेदवार बाहेक विकल्प नै देख्नुभएन । स्वतन्त्र उम्मेद्वारले जिते पनि वडाध्यक्षहरू पार्टीबाट आउछन् । केही गर्न सक्दैन । जित्न सक्नेलाई नै भोट दिनुपर्छ । ‘हुन त पार्टी बाहेकका मान्छेलाई टिक्न निदिएको जताततै देखेको हो तर एउटा मौका दिँदा त हुन्थ्यो होला । अनि मौका दिए त जसले पनि जित्न सक्छ नि !’ मनमनै भनेँ । चुनावको नतिजा जे भए पनि स्वतन्त्र विचारलाई समर्थन गर्ने निर्णय गरेँ ।

जे सुकै होला भन्दै भोट हालेको, बालेन शाहले जिते । मतगणना सुरु भएको ५ दिनसम्म त उनले जित्छन् जस्तो लागेकै थिएन मलाई त । काठमाडौं महानगरपालिका बाहेक धरान, धनगढी र जनकपुर उपमहानगरहरूमा पनि स्वतन्त्र रूपमा उठेका व्यक्तिहरूले चुनाव जिते । कुनै एउटा पार्टीको गढ भनेर चिनिएका धेरै ठाउँहरूमा अर्कै पार्टी वा व्यक्ति विजयी भए । स्थानीय निर्वाचनमा पहिलो हुने निर्वाचित हुने (प्रत्यक्ष) निर्वाचन प्रणाली छ जसको भरपुर उपयोग पार्टीगत राजनीतिबाट आजित भएका आम नागरिकले गरे ।

लोकतन्त्रमा दलहरूको भूमिका महत्त्वपूर्ण हुन्छ । हाम्रो त संविधानले नै “बहुदलीय प्रतिस्पर्धात्मक लोकतन्त्र”लाई आत्मसात् गरेको छ । त्यति मात्र हैन, समानुपातिक निर्वाचन प्रणालीले दलविहीनतालाई अस्वीकार गरिदिएको छ । यस्तोमा नेपालीहरूमा दलीय सोच हुनु अस्वाभाविक हैन । तर आफ्नो पार्टी सधैँ ठीक, सधैँ राम्रो भन्ने जुन तरिकाको सोच छ, त्यो परिवर्तन हुन जरुरी छ ।

आफ्नो स्वार्थ हेरेर कुनै राजनीतिक दलको आड लिने मानिसहरू धेरै सङ्ख्यामा छन् । उनीहरू न ती राजनीतिक दलका सिद्धान्त बुझ्छन्, न त नीति अनुसार चल्छन् । लाखौं रूपैयाँ “नेता”हरूका खल्तीमा भरिदिने हो पनि जोसुकै त्यो पार्टीको खुङ्खार नेता भनेर चिनिन्छ । यस्तो विचलनले पार्टीका इमानदार कार्यकर्ताको चित्त दुखाएको छ । यसको परिणाम चुनावमै देखिएको छ । टाउकेहरू अझै पनि अन्तर्घात र धाँधली भनिरहेका छन् । आफ्ना गल्ती सुधार्ने कुनै सोच देखिँदैन उनीहरूमा ।

यस्तोमा पार्टीका “नेता” भनाउँदालाई लाइनमा ल्याउने काम कार्यकर्ताको हो तर उनीहरू पनि आफ्नै स्वार्थमा अल्मलिएका छ्न् । नेतृत्व तह असहमति सहन सकिरहेको छैन । हरेक सिद्धान्त त प्रक्रियाको निर्मम समीक्षा हुनुपर्छ भन्नेहरू नै विरोधका मसिना स्वरहरूदेखि झस्केका जस्ता देखिन्छन् । यस्तो वाक्क लाग्दो राजनीतिको विकल्प केही ठाउँमा युवापुस्ताले खोज्न थालेको देखिन्छ ।

यद्यपि धेरै ठाउँमा सशक्त इमानदार विकल्प छैनन् । संघ र प्रदेशमा संसदीय व्यवस्था भएकाले राजनीतिक दलको विकल्प पनि राजनीतिक दल नै हुन् । कि त नयाँ इमानदार दल आउनुपर्‍यो कि त अहिलेका बेइमान दलहरू सुध्रिनुपर्‍यो । देश हाँक्ने मौका पाएका नेता र तिनका दलको त सुध्रिने छाँट छैन । पहिले इमानदार राजनीति गर्ने भनेर खुलेका पार्टी पनि कुर्सीकै राजनीति गर्न अग्रसर भएको देखिएकाले गर्दा नयाँ पार्टीहरूमा झट्ट विश्वास गर्ने अवस्था देखिएको छैन । कोभिड दौरान देखिएको “Enough is Enough” आन्दोलन संस्थागत गर्न चुकेकाले त्यस आन्दोलनको नेतृत्व पनि सशक्त हुने कुरामा शङ्कै छ । तथापि, पहिलेभन्दा फरक गर्न सक्ने मौका भने उनीहरूमा छ ।

नेपालमा अहिलेको जस्तो दलीय सोच हट्ला त ? असम्भव जस्तै देखिन्छ । तर दलमा आवद्ध भए पनि नभए पनि काम गर्न सक्ने मानिस छान्न भने नागरिकले चाहेको देखिन्छ । कुनै वादभन्दा पनि असहज परिस्थितिमा समेत भरोसा गर्न सक्ने नेतृत्व नागरिकले खोजेका छन् । खोजेजस्ता नेताहरू भेट्न गाह्रो होला तर केही प्रयास यही नै रहनेछ ।

डियर कमरेड

By Sandeept

On March 13, 2022

In Blogging, essay, Nepal, नेपाली

प्रकाश सपुतको गीत र भिडियोले तपाईंको मन पोलेछ । “हामीले त्यसलाई बोल्न सिकायौं अहिले हामी विरुद्ध बोल्ने ?” भन्ने प्रश्न गर्दा तपाईंको स्तर ठ्याक्कै त्यही सत्ताधारीको जस्तो भएको छ, जसको विरोध तपाईंहरू गर्नुहुन्थ्यो । कुनै बेला तपाईंले गाउने गीतहरू, देखाउने नाटकहरूका विरुद्ध सत्ता लाग्थ्यो । आज अरूका रचना माथि जाइलाग्ने स्थानमा पुग्नुभएछ । सामाजिक सञ्जालमा गीत बन्द गर्ने देखि सर्जकलाई मार्नेसम्मका कुरा गरिरहँदा एउटा कुरा भन्न मन लाग्यो, सत्तामा उक्लिएर शासक हुन सफल हुनुभएकोमा बधाई छ !

सत्तालाई सत्यले पोल्छ किनभने त्यसले तिनका झुठहरू छताछुल्ल पारिदिन्छ । एउटा गीतको भिडियोले सत्तामा तपाईंलाई यति छटपटी भएको छ भने पक्कै त्यसले सत्य उजागर गरेको छ । स्वाभिमानलाई तिलाञ्जलि दिएर देश बेच्ने तपाईंका कमाण्डरहरूप्रति भने गर्व गर्नुहुन्छ । कमरेड, सत्ता र शक्तिमा यति मोह किन गर्नुहुन्छ ?

कुनै एउटा सिर्जनामा सबै समस्या कहाँ उजागर हुन्छन् र ? समस्याका चाङ चुलिएका छन् । तपाईंको दृष्टि धुलिएको छ । जानुस्, आँखा धुनुस्, चस्मा फेर्नुस् । आफूले धोका दिएका छापामार साथीहरूसँंग भेट्नुस् । क्रान्तिलाई धोका दिने तपाईंका कमाण्डरहरू माथि प्रश्न गर्नुस् सर्जक र सिर्जनामाथि आक्रमण गर्नु अघि ।

आक्रमण गर्नु नै छ भने अरू सिर्जनामा गर्नुस् । कैँची चलाउनुस् तपाईंका कमाण्डरको यथार्थ देखाउने यी गीत (र अरू पनि होलान्) माथि । सक्नुहुन्छ ?

कलाकारको सम्मान र सम्पदा संरक्षणमा उदासीनता

By Sandeept

On September 23, 2021

In Blogging, essay, Literature, Nepal, Nepali

एकाबिहानै एउटा समाचारमा आँखा पर्‍यो । मनमा चस्स बिझायो । स्वर सम्राट नारायण गोपालको घर सङ्कटमा रहेछ । समाचारमा लेखिएको रहेछ–देवकोटाको घर पुनःनिर्माण हुन लागे पनि स्वर सम्राट नारायण गोपालको घर वेवास्तामा परेको छ । देवकोटाको घर पनि संरक्षण गरिएको चैं हैन । पूरै भत्काएर गरिएको पुनःनिर्माण हो । नयाँ बनाइएको घरमा पुरानो जत्तिको महत्व नहोला । वास्तवमा, हामीले सम्मान गर्दै आएका साहित्यकार र कलाकारका अमूल्य सम्पत्तिको रक्षा हामीले गर्नै सकेका छैनौँ ।

हामी साहित्य र कलालाई सम्मान गर्नै जान्दैनौँ । प्राचीन र मध्यकालीन कलाकार (मूर्तिकार, चित्रकार, वास्तुकलाविद्, साहित्यकार) हरू को सूची हामीसँग छैन । एकजना अरनिको प्रसिद्ध छन् मूर्तिकला र वास्तुकलामा, त्यो पनि चीन गएर सम्मानित भएकाले । सानै उमेरमा चीन जाने टोलीको नेतृत्व गर्ने अरनिकोले नेपालमा सिर्जना गरेका कलाहरू केके हुन् ? अरनिकोको वास्तविक नाम र ठेगानाका बारेमा पनि अझै अन्जान छु । अध्ययन भएको होला तर कुनै पाठ्यक्रममा पढ्ने मौका पाएको छैन । विदेशमा ख्याति नपाएसम्म आजपनि राज्यले चिन्दैन । परम्परा किन छोड्नु, हैन ?

मल्लकालका केही साहित्य र साहित्यकारका नाम सामान्य ज्ञानका किताबमा भेटिन्छ । त्यसबेलाका राजाहरू नै साहित्यकार ! पढ्ने लेख्ने राजाहरू मात्रै भएर हो कि ? जसले लेखेपनि ती महत्त्वपूर्ण ग्रन्थहरू र तिनमा के छ्न् भन्ने कुरा विद्यालयदेखि नै पढाइनु पर्ने हो । तर पाठ्यक्रम निर्माण गर्नेहरू आफ्ना कमसल लेखहरू पाठ्यक्रममा राख्न तत्पर छन् ।

आधुनिक नेपालमा (पहिले पर्वते या खसकुरा भनिने) नेपालीलाई केन्द्रविन्दुमा राखियो । सुवानन्द दासले लेखेको “पृथ्वीनारायण” काव्य नेपालीको पहिलो साहित्य भनेर घोकेको छु तर त्यसमा ठ्याक्कै के छ थाहा छैन । मोतीराम भट्टले नभेटेका भए भानुभक्त आचार्यलाई कतै गुमनाम हुने थिए । महत्त्व दिइएको भाषाका साहित्य पनि संरक्षित छैनन् । नेपाल भाषा, मैथिली, अवधी, तामाङ, किराँती लगायतका भाषा र जनजातिका साहित्य संरक्षण हुने कुरै भएन ।

सरकार त उदासीन भयो भयो, हाम्रा केही साहित्यकारहरू क्रान्तिकारी बन्ने नाममा इतिहासको संरक्षण नगरे पनि हुन्छ भन्ने विचार राख्छ्न् । देवकोटाको घर भत्काइएको विषयमा एकजना “लेखक”ले त्यो घर जोगाइयोस् या भत्काइयोस् मतलब भएन भन्ने आशयको ट्विट गरेपछि एउटा लेख नै लेखेको थिएँ । नारायण गोपालको घरको संरक्षण गर्ने विषयमा पनि उनको विचार जान्न मन लागेको छ ।

What can a human gain? Reflections from Vishwamitra’s tale

By Sandeept

On January 9, 2021

In Blogging, essay, Humanity, Humans and Humanity, Inspirational, Writing

Humans have no limit to their desires. Fulfill one, another is ready to knock your door. Sometimes, the desires inspire humans to do great things but most of the times, the crowds of desires take you to a deep dark ditch, from which it is impossible to come out.

Vishwamitra’s tales are all over Hindu scriptures. He appears not only in Ved and Puran (Shruti and Smriti) but also in Ramayan and Mahabharat (Kavya and Itihas). Born Vishwarath in the royalty of Kanyakubja, was initially mentored by Dattatreya, the avatar of Lord Shiva. As a king, he desires to become the Universal Monarch, the ruler of all the World. But a battle with Vashistha changes everything.

Vishwarath, happy and proud of his victories, one day appears at Vashistha’s ashram. The king and his soldiers are hungry and tired. However, the sage easily provides adequate food for the huge army. Vishwarath wants to know how. Vashistha shows him Nandini, the divine cow who can provide any wish.

Vishwarath wants the cow for himself despite Vashistha’s warning that Nandini has free will and will only go with Vishwarath if she wants to go. Enraged, he wants to capture the cow but with her powers, she created an army to destroy the king’s army.

Despite his loss, the king wishes to teach divine beings a lesson. He gains Daivi astras (divine weapons) through yagya and goes to attack Vashistha. The son of Brahma absorbs everything with a Brahmadanda (a stick).

Enraged, Vishwarath gives his kingdom to his sons and starts a tap. One day, while meditating, he discovers Gayatri Mantra, the beej (seed) mantra of creation. Vishwarath becomes Vishwamitra.

His discovery shakes Swarga. Indra sends Menaka, an apsara to disrupt his penance. Although, Vishwamitra falls for her beauty, when he realizes he had been tricked, he leaves her. Menaka goes back leaving their daughter Shakuntala to the ashram of another Rishi, Kanva.

Vishwamitra continues his Yogic practices, gains siddhi and reaches the level of Brahma when he creates a universe for Trishanku. Trishanku had been cursed by Vashistha’s son Shakra for wanting to go to heaven with his human body. Vishwamitra did what was forbidden but also gained the title of Maharishi from Brahma for the feat he accomplished.

But the desire of revenge against Vashistha does not die. He gets involved in a act that kills Shakra. Vashistha, while sad that his son died, is glad that Vishwamitra’s act has actually helped improve his clan morally. Vishwamitra, who had desired to kill Vashistha, comes to know that the Brahma Putra had actually guided him in his spiritual journey. He realizes that his journey was not to be the king of the world, but its friend, Vishwa Mitra.

The tale of Vishwamitra shows that humans can push their limits to any extent. They can even equal the Brahma. But the biggest achievement is to act on the benefit of the world. With great power, indeed comes great responsibilities.

(I was inspired to write this article after finishing Vineeth Aggarwal’s Vishwamitra.)